Also view CONSUMER
PRIVACY POLICY
Because the Clickshare Service System requires no standing
central user or names database, it enables
privacy without
demanding it.
Clickshare Service Corp. is not in the business of viewing or analyzing
demographic information about World Wide Web users. But the
Clickshare(sm) Service can serve as a source of raw data
for
market-research, audience measurement and advertisers -- always
with the user's consent. Here's
how:
Distributed control of demographics
Clickshare is designed as a two-tier system with regard to the
demographic information it can provide.
- All "personal
information" (name, address, phone, perhaps income, family info, etc)
is acquired by individual, affiliated Clickshare Service
Providers, and not by the Clickshare Service itself (that is, distributed
across
the Internet).
- Billable access information does reside
with the Clickshare Authentication and Logging Service, or
licensees, (and a local
copy of some of this information is received by the user's
"home-port" Clickshare Service Provider as well).
The Clickshare Authentication and Logging Service has only the global Clickshare
user ID (unique to each user) and csp-id (unique Clickshare Service Provider ID) as the
"correlation points". Personal information is never maintained by centrally.
At the start of a Clickshare "session", the user's Clickshare Service Provider
passes to the Clickshare Service preference information for the user, in
addition to information about that user's service class -- again, keyed only
by unique user ID. The Clickshare Service stores this information only for
the duration of that session. There is no permanent record of even this
preference information stored by the Clickshare service.
Why distribute sole ownership of name-and-address information out to
potentially thousands of Clickshare service providers rather
than maintaining it in one place?
- It creates the
incentive for the local service provider to build a
user base which he can
serve on a very detailed basis (from information users give as their
preferences, known only locally), and because the provider
knows that he may derive secondary income from selling personal
information to advertisers (when permitted by the users). At the
same time, the system architecture allows these independent "audience
owners" to participate in the service confident that critical information
about their users does not have to be shared except with the explicit
permission of them and their customers.
- It provides a better opportunity for personal privacy because the user
has a direct relationship only with one service provider.
Misuse of personal
information can be traced directly to one source.
-
This distributed system is "manageable" in every sense, which lowers the cost to
everyone.
Demographic information (that which is directly available only
from the end-user's service provider) is not, however, of
tremendous utility alone. It needs to be
accompanied by the "global" usage information assembled
(but not owned) by the Clickshare Authentication and Logging Service
to really be of any use -- because together one gets
the "global profile of use". So, there is a built-in incentive for local PMs to "play
ball" with Clickshare at all times -- each needs the other.
The Clickshare distributed-demographics design respects users --
and that is where the rubber meets the road. In an age when many
consumers are
getting increasingly worried about the ways in which their personal
information is used and sold by people they don't know, this design
(in combination with the features below) ENABLES privacy without
demanding it or excluding it.
For example, a
Clickshare Service Provider may
charge a user a higher rate, if they desire, to maintain a user's
privacy. Further, a Service Provider could (in association with an advertiser)
give away free subscriptions (subsidized by the advertiser) in return
for the user's participation in, say, "ads in all his email". Thus,
the user is in control to either reduce his cost or increase his
privacy.
What is known "globally?"
Globally, Clickshare knows about all access by every Clickshare user
to all billable content (or to free content which the original
content provider wishes tracked) across all cooperating content providers.
Clickshare can completely correlate all access -- how often a site is visited,
length of session, order of access, etc. - keyed to a specific user ID
("human", not "client"). At no time, however, is that actual identity of
a user (the human's name, address, etc) known.
Further, Clickshare can derive "global information"
as well -- how many users use a given site in a given day, which pages
are "hot", what are "hot" usage times, etc. This latter has benefit
to both providers and advertisers.
In the current design -- which has a great deal more room for
enhancement -- Clickshare passes the following information among
all Content Providers in the "User Profile" whenever the user accesses a
site:
PRIVACY 1: do not correlate user ID with usage
ADULT CONTENT: do not allow access to content of adult nature
AD CONTEXT: (1) no ads (2) sponsorship only (3) all adds
CUSTOMER GROUP: 16 groupings in which to "parcel" users
SERVICE CLASS: 16 classes
PAGE CLASS LIMIT: allow (or not) access to "premium pages"
PAGE # LIMIT: limit access by number of pages sent
SERV. PRIORITY: 16 priority classes (probably for audio/video usage)
The first group is "preference" information, the second "service"
information. One can imagine additional preferences or "soft
specifics" like:
MALE/FEMALE USER
AGE RANGE (1) 5-10 yrs (2) 11-15 yrs (3) 16-19 yrs ...
The Clickshare Digital Calling Card (SM) -- an open "box car" to
carry preference information
The Clickshare(sm) user profile engine is like an railroad boxcar. Its
architecture is flexible enough to leave open a range of opportunities for the
background transfer of user-preference and profile information between Service
Providers and Content Providers. The important points here are:
- We have not yet solidified
what preference information is "globally useful" to all content providers.
- Preference information is ignored/used at the Content Provider's peril
(mis-use will cause him to lose users), while service information
is used to his benefit (to save himself money, or to enable a premium
service.
Within these broad ranges, many details can be specified by our providers and
technical partners. However, in the current design, no entity
other than the user's chosen independent Clickshare Service Provider can
directly correlate a given user-id to an actual person, even
though lots of "not-too-specific" information can be made available
about that person's preferences.
Opportunities for audience-measurement services
The generation of "bills" to the Clickshare(sm) Service
Provider for
information purchases by consumer users is straight
forward, but involves a lot of data processing (assuming that there
are many -- say 10,000 -- content providers). However, this is a "one to many" problem
(one user, many providers) that we've designed to scale well.
The "settlement"
process, whereby all PMs are distributed compensation for all
"foreign access" is a "many to many" problem -- straight forward but
massive data processing.
Since both of the above activities produce correlated records of transactions,
some audience-measurement reports can be generated directly from
this work. Other, more sophisticated reports will require MUCH more data
processing (e.g., "How many users in all customer groups used premium pages
in March?", or "What percentage of users with the adult-content
flag turned off actually visited sites that advertise adult-content?")
One reason the latter is difficult is that you'd be dealing with a
complete census of all activity, not a statistical sample - the
equivalent of the Nielsen rating service having a counter on every TV set.
In our current business model, Clickshare is not designed as a full audience
measurement system. However, the data produced by Clickshare - multi-site tracking keyed
to a unique user ID - is ideal for such systems. We envision partnering with companies
who have more well-developed measurement tools.